Sacramento Bee Editorial: Coverage for all
Sunday, March 25, 2007
The state regulator of HMOs has fined one of the largest,
Blue Cross, $1 million for canceling health policies of enrollees who,
among other things, got pregnant. Cancellations like these weren't isolated,
according to the California Department of Managed Health Care. Rather,
they were systematic, right down to a computer program that scours the
system for enrollees seeking certain kinds of care.
Blue Cross denies wrongdoing. That's fine. There is a larger lesson here:
This health insurance market, the one for individuals or families who
don't automatically get covered through their jobs, is sick. Insurers
try to avoid covering people who need care. And many Californians avoid
getting insurance until it is in their financial interest to do so. It's
a game, and the game must end somehow. That can only happen by blowing
up the individual health insurance market that exists today and replacing
it with something that makes more sense. And that can only happen with
the California Legislature and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
There are two basic choices here when it comes to health insurance. One
is to get rid of private health insurance altogether and replace it with
a program in which the government directly pays doctors and hospitals
to provide care. That's known as single-payer. It is championed by some
Democrats, but opposed by the governor. Single-payer isn't a likely short-term
compromise, but the more we look at this mess, single-payer seems to be
an increasingly likely long-term solution because of the many ills of
the private insurance market.
The second choice is to fix the insurance market. How? Bottom line: It
means that health insurers such as Blue Cross have to cover all who apply,
even those who are eight months pregnant. On the flipside, everyone --
or just about everyone -- has to have insurance. It can be through his
or her company. It can be through a government-sponsored program. What
is important is to throw everyone into the pool. Insurance, when it works,
is all about spreading risks.
Either the governor and the Legislature somehow create this pool, or
they don't. All of the solutions by necessity would impose various mandates
-- either on employers, on individual Californians or in some combination.
And any solution will require money. Why? If the state were to require
everyone to have coverage and require insurance companies to cover anyone
who signs up, that would include many low-income Californians who don't
have insurance today. Those Californians can't be expected to pay full
freight. And they can't be left out of the equation, only to wander later
into emergency rooms and expect care.
In any sane health care system, getting pregnant should never be a cause
to lose health care.
Return to : Single Payer Articles
|